<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steven Chu&#8217;s Energy Miscalculations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2009/03/steven-chus-energy-miscalculations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2009/03/steven-chus-energy-miscalculations/</link>
	<description>Truth in Energy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Obama Tackles the Liquid Fuels Problem :: ASPO-USA: Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2009/03/steven-chus-energy-miscalculations/#comment-2557</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Tackles the Liquid Fuels Problem :: ASPO-USA: Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=1193#comment-2557</guid>
		<description>[...] Increased vehicle fuel efficiency as Dr. Chu wants, starting with strengthening of the EPA/CAFE rules as described above. Efficiency is supposed to save 1.8 billion barrels of oil during the lifetime of the cars sold between 2011 and 2016. The Union of Concerned Scientists estimates that the U.S. will save 1.4 million barrels-per-day by 2020 based on the new timetable. I do not know how either of these calculations were done, including the assumptions used for real world mileage, car sales, etc. So considerable uncertainty exists about what the real savings will be. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Increased vehicle fuel efficiency as Dr. Chu wants, starting with strengthening of the EPA/CAFE rules as described above. Efficiency is supposed to save 1.8 billion barrels of oil during the lifetime of the cars sold between 2011 and 2016. The Union of Concerned Scientists estimates that the U.S. will save 1.4 million barrels-per-day by 2020 based on the new timetable. I do not know how either of these calculations were done, including the assumptions used for real world mileage, car sales, etc. So considerable uncertainty exists about what the real savings will be. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planes, Trains and Automobiles :: ASPO-USA: Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2009/03/steven-chus-energy-miscalculations/#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Planes, Trains and Automobiles :: ASPO-USA: Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=1193#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>[...] In the real world2 nothing has changed on the ground—when did smaller cars and fuel efficiency (35 average mpg by 2020) become our National Religion? Where are the plug-in hybrids? Sales for gas electric (standard) hybrids have tanked in recent months and may remain low for years to come. Despite these weak measures, dearths and unfavorable indicators, our new Energy Secretary remains fanatical when it comes to efficiency as I discussed in Steven Chu&#8217;s Energy Miscalculations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the real world2 nothing has changed on the ground—when did smaller cars and fuel efficiency (35 average mpg by 2020) become our National Religion? Where are the plug-in hybrids? Sales for gas electric (standard) hybrids have tanked in recent months and may remain low for years to come. Despite these weak measures, dearths and unfavorable indicators, our new Energy Secretary remains fanatical when it comes to efficiency as I discussed in Steven Chu&#8217;s Energy Miscalculations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Secretary of Synthetic Biology :: ASPO-USA: Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2009/03/steven-chus-energy-miscalculations/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>The Secretary of Synthetic Biology :: ASPO-USA: Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=1193#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>[...] week&#8217;s column Steven Chu&#8217;s Energy Miscalculations1 attempted to answer the question what is the plan? for dealing with potential shortfalls in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week&#8217;s column Steven Chu&#8217;s Energy Miscalculations1 attempted to answer the question what is the plan? for dealing with potential shortfalls in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Noeldner</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2009/03/steven-chus-energy-miscalculations/#comment-2198</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Noeldner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=1193#comment-2198</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave:

Thanks for the thorough analysis. While it's good that Chu "gets" conservation, curtailment - i.e. behavior-focused solutions - remain off limits.  

In forty years our descendants will ask why we failed so miserably to conserve fossil energy for a relatively humane transition.  There will be many answers: "Our children needed to play soccer, and driving them to practises and games was the only way for them to do it."  "We had to mow our lawns."  "Our kids had to drive to school so they could participate in extra-curricular activites."  "We couldn't force people to stop playing on gasoline-powered toys."  "People had a right to live wherever they wanted to, in houses as large as they could afford.  And that meant driving everywhere."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave:</p>
<p>Thanks for the thorough analysis. While it&#8217;s good that Chu &#8220;gets&#8221; conservation, curtailment - i.e. behavior-focused solutions - remain off limits.  </p>
<p>In forty years our descendants will ask why we failed so miserably to conserve fossil energy for a relatively humane transition.  There will be many answers: &#8220;Our children needed to play soccer, and driving them to practises and games was the only way for them to do it.&#8221;  &#8220;We had to mow our lawns.&#8221;  &#8220;Our kids had to drive to school so they could participate in extra-curricular activites.&#8221;  &#8220;We couldn&#8217;t force people to stop playing on gasoline-powered toys.&#8221;  &#8220;People had a right to live wherever they wanted to, in houses as large as they could afford.  And that meant driving everywhere.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Spoley</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2009/03/steven-chus-energy-miscalculations/#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Spoley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=1193#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>There are about 200 countries in the world. I estimate that, at most, 20 are self sufficient in O&#38;G production and are "net exporters". That leaves about 180 countries that are "net importers" of O&#38;G. Currently the US of A is the third largest producer of O&#38;G behind Russia and Saudi Arabia and is a hugh importer of O&#38;G. Evidently Mr.Chu thinks the US will outstrip 80% of the planet in energy production fairly soon since we have all these decades to reverse our energy imports. Why would he believe that anyone else would dare compete with us? What nerve! Obamas biggest stimulus plan so far has been to deny drilling on the east, west and Alaskan offshore coasts. That of course is a stimulus for OPEC, not sir, the US of A. By the way, Cantarell is the third largest field on the planet. Brasils new discoveries are in the 40 billion barrel range and Canada has three offshore production platforms offshore Nova Scotia. All three of these production areas are on the EAST COAST of the Americas and we are hoping for sustained winds and 24 hours of sunlight. We're doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are about 200 countries in the world. I estimate that, at most, 20 are self sufficient in O&amp;G production and are &#8220;net exporters&#8221;. That leaves about 180 countries that are &#8220;net importers&#8221; of O&amp;G. Currently the US of A is the third largest producer of O&amp;G behind Russia and Saudi Arabia and is a hugh importer of O&amp;G. Evidently Mr.Chu thinks the US will outstrip 80% of the planet in energy production fairly soon since we have all these decades to reverse our energy imports. Why would he believe that anyone else would dare compete with us? What nerve! Obamas biggest stimulus plan so far has been to deny drilling on the east, west and Alaskan offshore coasts. That of course is a stimulus for OPEC, not sir, the US of A. By the way, Cantarell is the third largest field on the planet. Brasils new discoveries are in the 40 billion barrel range and Canada has three offshore production platforms offshore Nova Scotia. All three of these production areas are on the EAST COAST of the Americas and we are hoping for sustained winds and 24 hours of sunlight. We&#8217;re doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2009/03/steven-chus-energy-miscalculations/#comment-2196</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=1193#comment-2196</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dave. Very clear explanation. Guess we will have to wait for a full blown oil shortage crisis before there is enough discomfort for meaningful action. Unfortunately for me, Hirsh's worst case looks optimistic. Shortage begins, denial, finger pointing and blame, floundering, and then hopefully some meaningful action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave. Very clear explanation. Guess we will have to wait for a full blown oil shortage crisis before there is enough discomfort for meaningful action. Unfortunately for me, Hirsh&#8217;s worst case looks optimistic. Shortage begins, denial, finger pointing and blame, floundering, and then hopefully some meaningful action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2009/03/steven-chus-energy-miscalculations/#comment-2195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=1193#comment-2195</guid>
		<description>Chu, et al seem to be wed to the concept of continuous economic growth.  The emphasis on "efficiency" is apparently geared to getting more for less - with "more" being the key word.  The fact that exponential economic growth is a fundamentally flawed objective is conveniently ignored. The only rational strategy is to reduce demand and prepare for a far less energy intensive way of life.  The frantic race to find alternative sources of energy to partially replace conventional fuels misses the point; the current economic system is patently unsustainable.  Obama and company, albeit with good intentions, are simply repeating the mistakes of past administrations. As per the Hirsch Report, we are running out of time.  In fact, it may already be too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chu, et al seem to be wed to the concept of continuous economic growth.  The emphasis on &#8220;efficiency&#8221; is apparently geared to getting more for less - with &#8220;more&#8221; being the key word.  The fact that exponential economic growth is a fundamentally flawed objective is conveniently ignored. The only rational strategy is to reduce demand and prepare for a far less energy intensive way of life.  The frantic race to find alternative sources of energy to partially replace conventional fuels misses the point; the current economic system is patently unsustainable.  Obama and company, albeit with good intentions, are simply repeating the mistakes of past administrations. As per the Hirsch Report, we are running out of time.  In fact, it may already be too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

