<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mexican Oil Production Continues to Dive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/01/mexican-oil-production-continues-to-dive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/01/mexican-oil-production-continues-to-dive/</link>
	<description>Truth in Energy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is Libya An Important Source of Oil for the United States? &#124; Beneath the Oaks</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/01/mexican-oil-production-continues-to-dive/#comment-4923</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Libya An Important Source of Oil for the United States? &#124; Beneath the Oaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3164#comment-4923</guid>
		<description>[...] 2. Mexico (There are questions about production levels.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2. Mexico (There are questions about production levels.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariana Pereira</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/01/mexican-oil-production-continues-to-dive/#comment-4206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariana Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3164#comment-4206</guid>
		<description>Does anybody know what is the production obejective for Mexico, for weach region, or where I can find this data??
Thanks you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know what is the production obejective for Mexico, for weach region, or where I can find this data??<br />
Thanks you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: US Oil Production Rise in 2009 No Game-Changer &#124; HeatingOil.com</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/01/mexican-oil-production-continues-to-dive/#comment-3990</link>
		<dc:creator>US Oil Production Rise in 2009 No Game-Changer &#124; HeatingOil.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3164#comment-3990</guid>
		<description>[...] In a period of very high oil prices, we would likely see more of these projects or efforts to make those federal lands, much of which are situated inside pristine national parks, open to drilling. However, setting aside the uncalculated costs to America’s bastions of untouched wildlife, it’s unlikely that these projects would have any impact on the price of oil, which is a globally traded commodity influenced by worldwide supply fluctuations that dwarf any US contribution. In terms of lessening our dependence on foreign oil, increased oil production domestically, even on the order of 1 mbd, would only offset the export losses that we are already experiencing from major suppliers Mexico and Venezuela. As analyst Chris Nelder wrote in February, the combined export loss from these two countries, which together comprise two of our three largest sources of oil, was 0.89 mbd from 2005 through 2008. Roger Blanchard, oil analyst and author of “The Future of Global Oil Production”, finds it “likely” that Mexican oil exports will reach zero within the next ten years. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a period of very high oil prices, we would likely see more of these projects or efforts to make those federal lands, much of which are situated inside pristine national parks, open to drilling. However, setting aside the uncalculated costs to America’s bastions of untouched wildlife, it’s unlikely that these projects would have any impact on the price of oil, which is a globally traded commodity influenced by worldwide supply fluctuations that dwarf any US contribution. In terms of lessening our dependence on foreign oil, increased oil production domestically, even on the order of 1 mbd, would only offset the export losses that we are already experiencing from major suppliers Mexico and Venezuela. As analyst Chris Nelder wrote in February, the combined export loss from these two countries, which together comprise two of our three largest sources of oil, was 0.89 mbd from 2005 through 2008. Roger Blanchard, oil analyst and author of “The Future of Global Oil Production”, finds it “likely” that Mexican oil exports will reach zero within the next ten years. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Shields</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/01/mexican-oil-production-continues-to-dive/#comment-3847</link>
		<dc:creator>David Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3164#comment-3847</guid>
		<description>Roger: This is a highly interesting and well-informed piece. As a Pemex watcher here is Mexico, it seems very much in line with what I am observing and expecting. Can we be in touch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger: This is a highly interesting and well-informed piece. As a Pemex watcher here is Mexico, it seems very much in line with what I am observing and expecting. Can we be in touch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/01/mexican-oil-production-continues-to-dive/#comment-3787</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3164#comment-3787</guid>
		<description>I seen a figure of 588mbd for october production at Cantarell somewhere on the internet a month or so ago.  I now can not find that report, also I can not find any reports for November or December production levels.  So what's going on, have they stopped publishing data due to the negative impacts of publsihing the decline rates.  Have they starting putting their heads up their arses and hope nobody notices that they declines are continuing.   I read a brief article that said in October Cantarell showed signs of slowing production declines.  Well that would figure wouldn't it, as the overall production decreases and the numbers shrink, there is less to deduct from.  I suppose when production reaches zero they will report that they have successfully arrested the decline at Cantarall lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seen a figure of 588mbd for october production at Cantarell somewhere on the internet a month or so ago.  I now can not find that report, also I can not find any reports for November or December production levels.  So what&#8217;s going on, have they stopped publishing data due to the negative impacts of publsihing the decline rates.  Have they starting putting their heads up their arses and hope nobody notices that they declines are continuing.   I read a brief article that said in October Cantarell showed signs of slowing production declines.  Well that would figure wouldn&#8217;t it, as the overall production decreases and the numbers shrink, there is less to deduct from.  I suppose when production reaches zero they will report that they have successfully arrested the decline at Cantarall lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

