<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drawing the lower and upper boundaries of future oil supply By Rembrandt Koppelaar, ASPO Netherlands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/03/drawing-the-lower-and-upper-boundaries-of-future-oil-supply-by-rembrandt-koppelaar-aspo-netherlands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/03/drawing-the-lower-and-upper-boundaries-of-future-oil-supply-by-rembrandt-koppelaar-aspo-netherlands/</link>
	<description>Energy Action for a Healthy Economy and Clean Environment</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simpson in Slidell</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/03/drawing-the-lower-and-upper-boundaries-of-future-oil-supply-by-rembrandt-koppelaar-aspo-netherlands/#comment-3957</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simpson in Slidell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3329#comment-3957</guid>
		<description>On Monday, March 8, at 9 P.M. Central Standard Time, the National Geographic Channel ( # 276 on DIRECTV ) is going to run a new special about 'the changes that would have to take place on Earth if there were no longer any oil.' It is called, 'Aftermath: World Without Oil.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, March 8, at 9 P.M. Central Standard Time, the National Geographic Channel ( # 276 on DIRECTV ) is going to run a new special about &#8216;the changes that would have to take place on Earth if there were no longer any oil.&#8217; It is called, &#8216;Aftermath: World Without Oil.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simpson in Slidell</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/03/drawing-the-lower-and-upper-boundaries-of-future-oil-supply-by-rembrandt-koppelaar-aspo-netherlands/#comment-3952</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simpson in Slidell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3329#comment-3952</guid>
		<description>Was the head of Total wrong when he said that he thought that it would be impossible to increase world oil production much above 90 million barrels a day? 
Producing 30% more oil in 20 years than we produce today, seems a bit of a stretch to me. I hope that it happens for those of you who will still be around by then, but I think that the rapidly escalating cost of oil will cause very severe economic problems in half that time.
The unfortunate thing is that, except for the tiny portion of the population which has studied peak oil, most people think that there is still plenty of oil left. This misconception will cause the vast majority of people to continue to purchase oil powered vehicles long after electrically powered ones are available. Until fuel becomes very expensive, it won't seem worth spending the extra money for an electric car. If you didn't think a peak oil crisis was just around the corner, why would you go electric? They cost more, and you have to plug them in all the time. You can't take them on vacation to Yellowstone. And the price of lithium is going up, after the few lithium exporting countries formed OLEC, the Organization of Lithium Exporting Countries. Rumors are circulating that they are considering a scheme whereby, in the future, they will demand ownership of all the batteries made from the lithium that they export, with lease payments having to be made for their use, or they will begin to cut off the supply of lithium.
So nearly everyone will still be driving oil eaters when the oil peak suddenly becomes obvious from exploding oil prices. Add the impact of new oil extraction technology, which can drain an oil field faster, and the problem actually gets worse. Everyone is still driving oil eaters, and seemingly overnight, the oil price quadruples. Think what that extra fuel money drained from the economy will do to the demand for everything else. Aggregate demand will fall, and take with it, the millions of jobs that today service that demand.  
Should Washington encourage more natural gas drilling by every means possible? Yep, and fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the head of Total wrong when he said that he thought that it would be impossible to increase world oil production much above 90 million barrels a day?<br />
Producing 30% more oil in 20 years than we produce today, seems a bit of a stretch to me. I hope that it happens for those of you who will still be around by then, but I think that the rapidly escalating cost of oil will cause very severe economic problems in half that time.<br />
The unfortunate thing is that, except for the tiny portion of the population which has studied peak oil, most people think that there is still plenty of oil left. This misconception will cause the vast majority of people to continue to purchase oil powered vehicles long after electrically powered ones are available. Until fuel becomes very expensive, it won&#8217;t seem worth spending the extra money for an electric car. If you didn&#8217;t think a peak oil crisis was just around the corner, why would you go electric? They cost more, and you have to plug them in all the time. You can&#8217;t take them on vacation to Yellowstone. And the price of lithium is going up, after the few lithium exporting countries formed OLEC, the Organization of Lithium Exporting Countries. Rumors are circulating that they are considering a scheme whereby, in the future, they will demand ownership of all the batteries made from the lithium that they export, with lease payments having to be made for their use, or they will begin to cut off the supply of lithium.<br />
So nearly everyone will still be driving oil eaters when the oil peak suddenly becomes obvious from exploding oil prices. Add the impact of new oil extraction technology, which can drain an oil field faster, and the problem actually gets worse. Everyone is still driving oil eaters, and seemingly overnight, the oil price quadruples. Think what that extra fuel money drained from the economy will do to the demand for everything else. Aggregate demand will fall, and take with it, the millions of jobs that today service that demand.<br />
Should Washington encourage more natural gas drilling by every means possible? Yep, and fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Kopits</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/03/drawing-the-lower-and-upper-boundaries-of-future-oil-supply-by-rembrandt-koppelaar-aspo-netherlands/#comment-3948</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Kopits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3329#comment-3948</guid>
		<description>"The resulting picture gives lower and upper boundaries for production capacity between 87 million and 98 million barrels per day in 2015, and 63 million and 111 million barrels per day in 2030."

These are very large ranges.  The high 2030 range is well above the EIA, IEA, and most the IOC's.  If that's as good as it gets guys, it's time to go back to the drawing board and do a re-work.  There are no policy conclusions to be drawn of the back of forecasts so loose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The resulting picture gives lower and upper boundaries for production capacity between 87 million and 98 million barrels per day in 2015, and 63 million and 111 million barrels per day in 2030.&#8221;</p>
<p>These are very large ranges.  The high 2030 range is well above the EIA, IEA, and most the IOC&#8217;s.  If that&#8217;s as good as it gets guys, it&#8217;s time to go back to the drawing board and do a re-work.  There are no policy conclusions to be drawn of the back of forecasts so loose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
