<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 195 Californias or 74 Texases to Replace Offshore Oil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/</link>
	<description>Truth in Energy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Oil Spill in Perspective :: ASPO-USA: Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/#comment-4561</link>
		<dc:creator>The Oil Spill in Perspective :: ASPO-USA: Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3570#comment-4561</guid>
		<description>[...] 195 Californias or 74 Texases to Replace Offshore Oil (ASPO-USA) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 195 Californias or 74 Texases to Replace Offshore Oil (ASPO-USA) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 195 Californias or 74 Texases to Replace Offshore Oil : Hawaii Clean Power</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/#comment-4138</link>
		<dc:creator>195 Californias or 74 Texases to Replace Offshore Oil : Hawaii Clean Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3570#comment-4138</guid>
		<description>[...] This is a guest post by Chris Nelder. It was originally published by ASPO-USA. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a guest post by Chris Nelder. It was originally published by ASPO-USA. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/#comment-4078</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3570#comment-4078</guid>
		<description>Many good points here.    One thing though - you say "most of the typical green alternatives", this is all very well but you have completely failed to address geothermal, solar, biomass / biodiesel / ethanol, and hydrogen, each of which may well have a serious part to play.

I don't think there is one "band aid' solution; I think the answers will have to come from the implementation of a number of ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many good points here.    One thing though - you say &#8220;most of the typical green alternatives&#8221;, this is all very well but you have completely failed to address geothermal, solar, biomass / biodiesel / ethanol, and hydrogen, each of which may well have a serious part to play.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there is one &#8220;band aid&#8217; solution; I think the answers will have to come from the implementation of a number of ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luckymortal</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/#comment-4074</link>
		<dc:creator>luckymortal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3570#comment-4074</guid>
		<description>The article makes the assumption that our current levels of general consumption are sustainable, just and need to continue. 

Peak oil is only one symptom of a larger problem of an economic system requiring unsustainable levels of consumption. It's not just peak oil, it's peak everything, including peak stress to our ecosystems, which is evidenced by the mass extinction event going on around us. 

The only realistic solution is to address the root cause of unsustainable over-consumption of resources, not the symptom of us no longer having enough energy to continue the problem!

End offshore drilling and let the market make the necessary corrections in our consumption lifestyle. The sooner we do, the less prolonged and dire the negative effects of the REAL problem will be.  

BTW, there will still be "an economy," just a healthier, less centralized one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article makes the assumption that our current levels of general consumption are sustainable, just and need to continue. </p>
<p>Peak oil is only one symptom of a larger problem of an economic system requiring unsustainable levels of consumption. It&#8217;s not just peak oil, it&#8217;s peak everything, including peak stress to our ecosystems, which is evidenced by the mass extinction event going on around us. </p>
<p>The only realistic solution is to address the root cause of unsustainable over-consumption of resources, not the symptom of us no longer having enough energy to continue the problem!</p>
<p>End offshore drilling and let the market make the necessary corrections in our consumption lifestyle. The sooner we do, the less prolonged and dire the negative effects of the REAL problem will be.  </p>
<p>BTW, there will still be &#8220;an economy,&#8221; just a healthier, less centralized one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Further reading &#124; FT Energy Source &#124; FT.com</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/#comment-4073</link>
		<dc:creator>Further reading &#124; FT Energy Source &#124; FT.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3570#comment-4073</guid>
		<description>[...] - 195 Californias, 74 Texases, or offshore oil [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - 195 Californias, 74 Texases, or offshore oil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orran Andrade</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator>Orran Andrade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3570#comment-4071</guid>
		<description>As Heinberg said, "The Party's Over."  What a good time to replace supply-side economics, end holiday celebrations and act with full-force in replacing infrastructure for sustainability. Or, as Chomsky put it, continue to regard "the fate of the species as another externality that must be ignored."  Who's in charge anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Heinberg said, &#8220;The Party&#8217;s Over.&#8221;  What a good time to replace supply-side economics, end holiday celebrations and act with full-force in replacing infrastructure for sustainability. Or, as Chomsky put it, continue to regard &#8220;the fate of the species as another externality that must be ignored.&#8221;  Who&#8217;s in charge anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awbeattie</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/#comment-4070</link>
		<dc:creator>awbeattie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3570#comment-4070</guid>
		<description>By your reckoning the Japanese would have moved on past Hawaii to the West Coast and would now be running Wall Street.

What part of Peak Oil and mobilization don't you understand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By your reckoning the Japanese would have moved on past Hawaii to the West Coast and would now be running Wall Street.</p>
<p>What part of Peak Oil and mobilization don&#8217;t you understand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodities Broker &#124; Drumbeat: June 1, 2010 &#124; Commodities Options &#124; Commodities Futures &#124; Commodities Prices</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/#comment-4069</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodities Broker &#124; Drumbeat: June 1, 2010 &#124; Commodities Options &#124; Commodities Futures &#124; Commodities Prices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3570#comment-4069</guid>
		<description>[...] 195 Californias or 74 Texases to Replace Offshore Oil The Real Challenges of Energy Transition [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 195 Californias or 74 Texases to Replace Offshore Oil The Real Challenges of Energy Transition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJMClark</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/#comment-4067</link>
		<dc:creator>KJMClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3570#comment-4067</guid>
		<description>If there are no price increases, there is no impetus to change!  If you really think that we're going to plan our way out of this predicament, look at the 70s.  We kicked out the guy who wanted planned change, and voted in mister free-market.  In the US, we "believe" in the market.  Changes will come as a result of price increases, and little else.  

So no, Chris, we won't be spending $100 billion per year on rail until prices force that change, in which case the rail companies will be flush enough with cash to make the changes themselves.  That's how the private market-based system works.  And it will work, though primarily through demand destruction.

And don't worry.  We won't shut down oil exploration in the Gulf.  We'll just adopt rules like the Brazilians for drilling safety, and probably require some kind of catastrophe fund contributions from companies carrying out drilling.  I.e., we'll allow drilling, but make it much more expensive.  Again, a good thing, since that's part of where the price signal will come from to force people to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there are no price increases, there is no impetus to change!  If you really think that we&#8217;re going to plan our way out of this predicament, look at the 70s.  We kicked out the guy who wanted planned change, and voted in mister free-market.  In the US, we &#8220;believe&#8221; in the market.  Changes will come as a result of price increases, and little else.  </p>
<p>So no, Chris, we won&#8217;t be spending $100 billion per year on rail until prices force that change, in which case the rail companies will be flush enough with cash to make the changes themselves.  That&#8217;s how the private market-based system works.  And it will work, though primarily through demand destruction.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t worry.  We won&#8217;t shut down oil exploration in the Gulf.  We&#8217;ll just adopt rules like the Brazilians for drilling safety, and probably require some kind of catastrophe fund contributions from companies carrying out drilling.  I.e., we&#8217;ll allow drilling, but make it much more expensive.  Again, a good thing, since that&#8217;s part of where the price signal will come from to force people to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 195 Californias or 74 Texases to Replace Offshore Oil - GetRealList</title>
		<link>http://www.aspousa.org/index.php/2010/05/195-californias-or-74-texases-to-replace-offshore-oil/#comment-4066</link>
		<dc:creator>195 Californias or 74 Texases to Replace Offshore Oil - GetRealList</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspousa.org/?p=3570#comment-4066</guid>
		<description>[...] is a guest post I wrote for the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO) &#8211; USA&#8217;s Peak Oil Review, in which I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a guest post I wrote for the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO) &#8211; USA&#8217;s Peak Oil Review, in which I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

